The year ends with the expected failure of the climate summit in Copenhagen, the sum of all errors on climate and the environment according to Carlo Ripa di Meana, Chairman of the National Landscape former European Commissioner for the Environment and president of Italy Nostra. On the subject of this blog host soon other voices. .
"The Climate Conference in Copenhagen wanted to save from global warming polar bears white, and is instead managed to get humans in Denmark and hooded blacks, the black bloc, which smash the historic cities, thus concluding with a spectacular failure . It was a conference game badly prepared with rhetorical and theatrical attitudes and, above all, scientifically based issue and handled, put on trial before the work with data emerging from the scandal of the University of climate-gate ' East Anglia, forgery confirmed during the work when Al Gore, in announcing the advanced thawing North Pole, he cited a source within a few hours has denied the former U.S. vice-president than he had given. The management of the conference by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, the same Al Gore, Prince Charles and the Adviser to the Prime Minister Brown, Nicholas Stern, was demagogic and reckless. A strong contribution in this direction came catastrophic and hysterical for months and months of President Barack Obama. So it happened that a European capital was well organized on its knees for twelve long days ending with a flop planetarium.
However, it is preferable to a failure to a poor compromise. Obama's words have often done miracles but I think his ability to illusionism climate is declining: in case global warming, in fact, the President has not had its Senate, and then at the end of the recitation of Hillary Clinton has announced one hundred billion dollars to the poorest countries to reduce their emissions. This decision has no other firm and binding commitments of the United States is still enrolled in the political consciousness of the gifts that try to save, in this case, to conceal the lack of other commitments in the USA. The problem is not solved some way. It is a fact CO2 emissions from emerging countries to constitute a major problem. If you want to reduce the anthropogenic pollution of the planet must begin by doing in the U.S., China and, subsequently, in India, in Messico, in Brasile.
La Conferenza ha svelato molte cose importanti di cui si dovrà tener conto. Prima di tutto è emerso che non è all’ordine del giorno la fine della civiltà industriale basata sul carbone, che include la siderurgia, la metalmeccanica, la petrolchimica. La società contemporanea carbon-free non è pronta. Il potere politico, è un’altra constatazione dopo la Conferenza di Copenhagen, non ha imboccato la strada del nucleare che è il modo diretto, piaccia o no, per ridurre il CO2. Eloquente a tale proposito il silenzio della grande Russia nucleare. Si è inoltre visto che la green industry a oggi è molto esile: lo constatiamo con una punta di ironia proprio nel momento in cui we propose, with incorrigible rhetoric, a new generation of bicycles with pedal assistance, developed by an Italian in the U.S.. It must be recognized by observers honest and realistic that you do not live to digital networks intelligent, smart grid, also expensive, which should replace all elettrocondotti, energy grids, etc.. . Enel has not enough that the technology to close abandoned mines in the excess CO2 to speak of a significant green Italian industry.
The Copenhagen Conference is founded on expectations developed abnormally in public opinion, on the basis of a bad culture and scientific data manipulated to sculpt in bronze that man is altering il clima producendo il riscaldamento globale, e che a tal fine occorrono misure autoritarie e spese sovrumane per evitare l’Apocalisse, si attendevano la palingenesi onusiana. Al Gore e Ban Ki-moon hanno già proposto di fare un nuovo summit a fine 2010 in Messico, preceduto da un incontro preparatorio a Bonn verso la metà del 2010. Anche lì, a Bonn e poi in Messico, si rischia di non concludere alcunché di efficace e reale, se non verrà rimossa la premessa, oggi ancora indiscutibile, che è alla base della teoria del global warming: è l’uomo che governa il clima e che solo lo può modificare. Se si vuol fare davvero qualcosa per sbloccare lo stallo in cui la grande impostura climatica ha paralizzato le Nazioni Unite, as we saw in Copenhagen when tens of thousands of young people came from all over the world have experienced the frustration of defeat, and uselessness of repeated clashes with the police according to the plan of the black bloc, it must, I believe, make a thorough scientific study of problem, without surrender to the apocalyptic profession. We really need first of all good science and not whining, too violent, as in Copenhagen, on the economic injustice as a scapegoat for all problems. In this picture made of hard reality, Europe needs to rethink who to trust: it can not continue to put in the hands of apocalyptic serrano lobby Prime Minister Gordon Brown, with the mature Crown Prince, the enarchi in Paris, Legambiente, Greenpeace and Rifkin in Rome. So it only creates frustration, temporary rhetoric and nothing.
In Italy, for example, a different opinion and there was strengthened in 2009, but many do not know for silence, not innocent, of a part of Journal Communications. Words of truth, however, wrote the paper and in particular Liberal. The analysis of the Center Bruno Leoni, have offered a consistent and accurate argument against extreme scenarios of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). There are eminent scientists and great communicators, as Antonino Zichichi, Franco Prodi, Franco Battaglia, Folco Quilici, who they also said and written words weighed and authoritative. Even in politics there have been skeptical positions and proposals. Skeptical of the opinions adopted by a majority of doomsday predictions by the IPCC and soaked, submerged cities, the geographic poles, liquefied, the end of the ecosystem. Just think of the area, very critical, authoritatively taken by the President of the Senate Environment Committee, Antonio d'Ali. The same Italian government has appeared among the least dogmatic and demagogic EU: I can remember some objections earlier in the year 2009 came from Environment Minister Prestigiacomo and by the same Prime Minister Berlusconi. Despite this, however, Italy Copenhagen has not played any role. Not weighed.
I remember, then, that on wind energy (the paper preferred by Italian lobby for renewable energy) is a scandal supra. Just read the Herald Tribune U.S. Monday, December 14, where it is said in the first page that comes in the wake of renewable fraud. And mentioning the countries which took place before these illegal elsewhere: Italy leads the group that includes Spain and Portugal.
We can not continue along the wrong track. We will break your head. Point out that the Czech President Vaclav Klaus has clearly set the problem before us, among the largest of the future, energy and climate. That opinion deserves to be studied.
Italy should prepare for a season of investigation of scientific truth confronting the great deception that has so far dominated the Journal. From Italy should be a truthful assessment of the potential of the green economy, which currently are not those of his supposed chimeric "sweeping expansion". Before Copenhagen some of us wanted to organize in Italy, Volterra, a meeting that would put the question of future energy and climate of the planet in a different way. Yes, we wanted to invite Vaclav Klaus, politicians open and problematic, as is Ali, Casini, Bondi and Granata, many great scientists and those who do not want to rely on an international level only at terrorizing vulgate also promoted by economic interests are not innocent of the lobby. That Congress would have to reopen the preliminary scientific IPCC context, where there are errors. Has anyone thought that we would be put into question the scientific manipulation of the summit on climate change, ideologically and politically supported without reservation by a majority of the participating countries. Facts have proved that we were right to organize that conference, although it is very tiring and stressful to call an international meeting in contrast, free, independent, rational. I remain of the opinion that what we have well done will be done in view of the two stages of Bonn and Mexico, after Copenhagen. The great deception is visible to the naked eye. The stall also. But the many prophets of the apocalypse, those naive and those of business, tried again. It would be good that this time they were bent by the knowledge and rationality.
.
Carlo Ripa di Meana, a member of Our Italy, Chairman of the National Landscape
.
A document unconventional and common sense, this Liberal Ecology that largely could share, if there were no citations or undeserved praise for some scientists, and political advisers. And why, Then, look for characters from the proscenium? Science is not anonymous enough? (NV)
0 comments:
Post a Comment